Is there any expectation of extending this to support nested objects? aka something.somethingelse.something
I have taken your base and manipulated it with some other examples I have found to support this but it is not fully functional. As I do not fully understand how this works. I can supply you with the code I got if your willing to make the modification to your base to support this.
The problem I have with mine is as long as all of the nested objects are populate it works, but if they are not they will have a value of null and it causes an compare error. These objects are not of type nullable but they have a value of null.
Does this make any sense?
Thanks for the library its been very helpful.
I have taken your base and manipulated it with some other examples I have found to support this but it is not fully functional. As I do not fully understand how this works. I can supply you with the code I got if your willing to make the modification to your base to support this.
The problem I have with mine is as long as all of the nested objects are populate it works, but if they are not they will have a value of null and it causes an compare error. These objects are not of type nullable but they have a value of null.
Does this make any sense?
Thanks for the library its been very helpful.